Gads, there are some folks on my FB feed that really make me feel like I am in a recurring REN AND STIMPY loop.
Ok, so a lot of my friends have higher academic standing. Which means they’ve had the tenacity to endure the torture that acquiring a PhD* entails. For the record, I don’t find my PhD training in Europe to be torture at all, it is sheer joy 90% of the time, but I’ve been in science a
long
long
long
time. And as such, I am used to a few things. Things like:
1 — Just because a person has a PhD means nothing as far as intelligence. They are probably over room temp. Maybe even room temp in the Sahara. But that doesn’t mean that they have a remote clue about EVERYTHING IN EXISTENCE.
2 — having trained many a PhD candidate and postdoc, the CO can say with a fairly high degree of confidence that having a PhD does not mean someone is smart. It means they can buckle down and get it done. Possibly kicking and screaming.
3 — having a PhD in anything other than applied statistics, industrial engineering, reliability engineering, quality engineering, applied mathematics, statistics does not mean that the work done is actually worth anything practical. As Tukey said, there are “lies, damned lies, and statistics”. More PhDs than one can shake a stick at are terrible at statistics, don’t understand the basic rudimentary constructs of different types of statistics, are afraid of statistics, and just plain use a statistical algorithm because everyone else in their field used that same test. This does not mean they are doing good work. IT just means they can mimic a test and get a printout that says there is or is not a reason to reject the null.
4 — the CO believes there is a glut of American PhDs that think that because they have a PhD they are worth more respect than the guy that fixes their plumbing. Personally, anybody that would wade in muck and fix a backed up sewer system on Christmas Eve is definitely worth more respect than any PhD, ever. Period.
5 — PhDs are, by definition, generally worthless. This is to say that they cease being ‘generalists’ when they do their thesis, and unless they are very, very good at engaging in multiple projects to stretch themselves, they become very specific in their knowledge. If someone came up to the CO and asked her what was killing their pine trees, it is possibly that she could figure it out eventually, but since she spends most of her time with the Nightshade family, she’s generally NOT the person you’d ask for help with your grain production, or turfgrass problems. Besides, turfgrass is an environmentally irresponsible reality.
6 — that last sentence brings me to the next point — Arrogance. Some of us are not arrogant because of our graduate work. We were arrogant before our graduate work and our graduate environment allows us to continue. We really are asses. We don’t all mean to be, although there are a few of us that actually believe that we are better than others as a result of our interest in methodical engineering/scientific practice. Probably a high proportion of us are high functioning autistics with very little patience for what we consider idiotic conversation. We treat each other this way as well — for instance, the “pure” or “basic” sciences vs. the “soft” sciences. It’s all hard work. Some of us “pure” or “scientific/applied” folks don’t understand the work involved in Political Science or Sociology and find it dreadfully tiresome, just as folks in other fields find our work to be dreadfully tiresome. This is why it is always a bad idea to take a non-scientific spouse to a conference dinner and expect marital harmony. Unless —
7 — PhD’s don’t always attract other PhDs. Sometimes real humans partner with PhDs; real, honest, caring folks. These folks help to metre the arrogance and elitism of those folks that have somehow managed to inflate our ego to the point of our graduate work.
There’s a reason why the layterm for PhD is “Piled Higher and Deeper”. It’s a narrow pile.
HOWEVER! There is hope! There do exist a few beacons of hope and sanity in the advanced academic standing population. Generally these are folks that have had their PhD long enough to realize it really doesn’t mean that much except to get jobs in fields that are pretty tiny or involve education or for promotions or to practice in some sort of medical field (for a rant on why the MD/ND/DO/DNP etc is NOT a scientific degree, stay tuned — these are engineering degrees, not knowledge degrees). Thankfully the CO has worked with a few of them. There’s one on Long Island out East. There’s one in the Soil Lab at Rutgers. There’s a couple in the plant bio dept at Rutgers as well. There are a couple in the hort dept at Farmingdale State. And there’s a retired scientist not far from Rhode Island that is probably the best example of a humane, humble, I know-what-I-know-and-can-learn-from-YOU advanced academic that I have had the fortune to know.
So. Long story short — got a PhD? Not exempt from R&S** statments.
—–
* or MD, ND, DO, EdD, ThD, DNP, etc…
**Ren & Stimpy